Mary’s digital life

Wired News, “Her So-Called Digital Life “Internet consultant Mary Hodder spends most of her life online. She has gone almost entirely digital. It may not be long before you do, too. “

We are now living in a beginning of “Always On” age. The internet connections are overlapping anywhere. Thus people like Mary and many of us can live in a digital life around the clock. But I believe the life is not as virtual as those gamers live. People are still real in this new paradigm. They will still meet in those cafe, however, must have APs in. Many social software like blog can actually reflect or extend one’s real life in a digital way, but not a virtual way. Blog, for example, can act as one’s anchordesk and stand points in ‘real’ time. The audience of blog can make ‘conversation’ with the people behind while the guy can do other things. In such way, digital life means high effectiveness, high efficiency, while keeping people in high social existence. In philosophical words, the Ontology and Epistemology didn’t change a lot.

Mary ever talked with me on social network service and blog in U.C. Berkeley. Now I know how she can get those insight, just from her called digital life.

我不是博客

我不是博客(我的口头禅:这话说了一千遍了),因为我没有什么好博的。

FXD是博客,因为他在千方百计地博,没博出亚洲,却已经博向了世界

我们不应当嘲笑任何人的梦想,但是要看他是否践踏着别人的梦想。看FXD可能觉得自己在接近他自己的梦想边缘,但却不是人人的梦想。在某些人看来,风险投资仿佛是稻草,仿佛是试金石,可别忘了4年前那场由“试金石”主导的互联网商业泡沫是如何破灭的。

忽然想起了Tim Berners Lee,这位科学家为我们创造了Web(W3C刚刚欢庆成立十周前),却放弃了收取专利费得以领富全球的机会。也想起了Bill Gates,他创造了一个软件帝国,虽然靠垄断的Windows 榨取了很多,却也甘愿把巨额的财富以基金会的形式捐赠出去。商业化也好,非商业化也好,都可以做出一定的贡献。BKZG拿到了一笔风险投资,无可厚非,双方各取所需。如果把有限的钱用到多为客户创造价值,尊重每个用户的权利上多好。沽名钓誉,吹破山河,只会落得个难堪的收场,此为鉴言。FXD推崇 Lawrence Lessig,却根本不尊重用户的权利,更不用说自由文化的本质;他也推崇Dan Gillmor,却不知道别人如何关注事实;他还推崇Tony Perkins,也无非看到别人办媒体的成果而已。原来他抬出他们,无非借虎皮来拉自己的破旗,知行不一,莫过于此。有Fans以其名而慕,同样该注意德行的负影响才是。话虽至此,却要小心这位的蛊惑,说不定哪天冒出来BKZG要制定全中国的博客标准,大家乖乖地跟着某些利益集团的阴谋进套吧。

对不起FXD,我不在“你为人人”的人里面,因为我不需要看BKZG;我更不会在“人人为你”的人里面,我愿为那些更实实在在的人。我是写Blog的Blogger,但“我不是博客”。(会做图标的朋友,你们设计一个这样的标牌,我会放在自己的网站上)